Girlish Figures

Yesterday, Nathan and I invited several friends over to play. And by “Nathan and I”, I mean me. And by “play”, I mean all the moms corralling five kids (four who were under one year) while chatting about the joys and excitements of diaper changes, breastfeeding, pureed foods and finding time to shave our legs while keeping the kids from grabbing each other’s hair, eyes, cheeks, lips, gums, toys, clothes, legs, toes, shoes, ears and ADORABLE little hair bows that made me wish I could put one in Nathan’s hair.

And leggings. Let’s not forget the leggings and tunics and precious little sweaters. Or the skinny jeans. I kid you not – all three of the baby girls that showed up were wearing either skinny jeans or leggings and I just wanted to keep them all just so I could play dress up. The babies, that is. Not the leggings.

But. We have a boy. So no leggings. And even though I think Nathan looks cute in just about anything he wears, Jon most likely would disagree. Or at least that’s what I figure since I casually mentioned that one of my friends had a 6-12 month snowsuit that we could borrow for our upcoming ski trip.

“You mean it used to be Julia’s?” he asked.

“Yeah. I guess it’s in great shape.”

“What’s it look like?”

“It’s just pink with purple polka dots.”

Then he launched into lecture-mode. “No SON of MINE is EVER going to wear a snowsuit with PINK and PURPLE polka dots.”

So, lucky for Nathan and his dad, his Gammy found him a nice navy blue snowsuit on sale. I don’t think they realize how lucky they are because me and my money-pinching ways would have definitely borrowed the snowsuit. Pink and purple polka dots notwithstanding.

I figure you guys can handle my honesty. My mother called me stingy this morning on the phone (and she didn’t say it all mean like that, I just casually mentioned that I wasn’t going to blow $50 on dinner out and she said something about how that doesn’t shock her and I was like, I know I’m becoming stingy and she said “becoming?”. So I guess she didn’t TECHNICALLY call me stingy, but I feel like the implication was definitely there.) Anyway. So, thank you so much, Gammy!! Nathan will look like the adorable little boy he is now!

Speaking of dinner out, Jon and I will be celebrating our third anniversary next week. Which I think is a great time to wrap up the story of us, so I’ll be posting that on our big day, the 15th. We’ve planned to get dinner out and I’ve planned to get my hair cut that afternoon so I don’t look quite so much like a more-straggly version of that old country singer who wears blankets around all the time. Not that it matters too much, because with how much Nathan is into grabbing everything that is and is not moving nowadays, I have had COUNTLESS chunks of hair ripped out of my scalp so I tend to keep it up more than down these days. However. Since we’re doing a nice dinner out and might even potentially spend that $50 on dinner, I will probably actually do more with my hair than put it in a ponytail.

And this is another side note, but waaaaaay back when Jon and I were dating/engaged/married-without-children, I liked to watch What Not to Wear (and no idea why I just used the past tense of that because I still like to watch it, I just never do). And there were always these shows about these ladies who used to be all stylish and cute and then they had a baby and became that Poor Young Mom who only wore sweatpants and their husband’s undershirts. And I used to tell Mom and Cayce this: “If I EVER become like that as a mom, will you PLEASE just slap me really hard? So hard that I fly back into a decent pair of jeans? I do NOT understand why it would be so hard to actually look nice even if you DO have a baby.”

Well. I say this as one who is sitting here in sweatpants and one of her husband’s undershirts, I now know, Poor Young Moms. I now know.

And speaking of young moms, I just want to say a big THANKS to all my sweet friends who came to visit yesterday. Not only was it so much fun laughing with y’all about all the fun things we get to do nowadays, but Nathan crashed for a great nap yesterday afternoon and Jon got to hear a 45-minute breakdown of the clothes that all the baby girls were wearing. So I know that he’s now scared to death that we might have a baby girl someday and I’m going to spend our last dollars on a pair of skinny jeans and leggings for her.

Which won’t happen, really. Because like my mother told me today, I’m stingy.

Or implied. If you want to get all technical about it. 🙂

Y’all have a great day!
Photobucket

6 thoughts on “Girlish Figures

  1. I am feeling the need to comment – and correct. HA! 🙂 I do not remember calling you stingy. I'm pretty sure I just agreed with you when you said it. I am nothing if not agreeable. 🙂

    You know I love you with all your quirkiness…and may I even say, sometimes your stinginess. But for the record, I will never let that grandbaby of mine go without anything I deem necessary, which in this case is a snowsuit.

    You and Jonny enjoy your anniversary dinner out. And make it a nice one…like $50 nice! We'll have a blast with Nathan, which might just include spending a few "necessary" dollars on him… What are grandparents for anyway? 🙂

    In signing off, I'm thinking it might be necessary to steal a quote from Jonny, "I love you! You're beautiful!" Hahaha!! 🙂

  2. I really really really loved this post! You crack me up Erynn! And, I think I am a bit stingy too, and of course – a simpleton. So we are good for eachother, OR maybe not!!! haha
    It was VERY fun hanging with all you mommies, and I can't wait till my baby is on the floor with yours… just wondering what kind of attire s/he will be wearing?!?!! Will I be borrowing the navy blue snowsuit or the purple polka dot one?! 🙂 MUAH!!!

  3. hahaha, Erynn, you crack me up!

    I do agree with you/Leigh Ann. Well, not on the baby part (I am only 18 and single after all…) but I'm the girl who just bought her prom dress for $45, because I REFUSE to spend hundreds on a gown that I'm wearing for four hours!

    So, I guess you could say that I'm "stingy" (or a simpleton) too… 🙂

  4. It's not stingy, sweetheart. It's called being a good steward, which is a perfectly wonderful thing! I'm raising 4 kids on an income hovering near the poverty level, and people are always telling me how cute they look. I buy clothes at thrift stores, cut their hair myself (most of the time) and generally scrimp and save on everything I buy. That's not stingy, it's doing a lot with very little, which is what we moms do! Keep up the good work!

    PS, my daughter and I just finished Matchpoint. Awesome book!

  5. Hi Erynn,
    Happy almost 3 year anniversary!!! I have been reading your blog for a while now but this is the first time I am leaving a comment! My sister and I love your books and can't wait for more!! 🙂 I am a mom of 2 young boys and married to my best friend (12 years this coming June) I love reading about your first time mom experiences with Nathan!! He is a doll and doesn't it go way too fast! My oldest is Jack who is 4 1/2 yrs old and my youngest is Noah who just turned 1 last week! Thanks again for your wonderful blog and have a GREAT time out with your husband celebrating!!
    Sara Haserot

  6. I LOVE Nathan's smile! Whenever I see it in my Reader feed I have to smile myself. You are definitely a blessed woman to have that smile around you all the time :o)

Comments are closed.